LinkReadyFIELD GUIDE / LINKREADY · Reading & libraries
Build a source-checking brief from a Readee technology story
Separate summaries, AI opinions, and source-backed facts; check timing and scope before handing over a short news brief.
By LinkReady · Updated
Choose one story relevant to a real question
Suppose a story says a developer tool has launched a feature, and you want to know whether your team should investigate. Open Readee, browse by popularity to find discussion, then switch to recency for recently selected items. Choose one story and record its title and your reading date. Ranking helps discovery; it is not verification. This is a hypothetical event, not a claim that a changing homepage story remains current.
Extract three checkable claims
Read the Chinese summary and write three lines: what launched, who can use it, and when it is available. Read the three AI commentary voices separately, recording technical concerns, product value, and industry interpretations. Turn a challenge into a question such as “Is this available to every account?” The dialogue is AI-generated, not three independent interviewees or three independent pieces of evidence.
Follow the source link to primary material
Open the original article link and check that its title, publication date, and body correspond. If it is a media report, follow its references to the vendor announcement, product documentation, or original research. If no primary source is found, say so. Check access scope, regional limits, and dates against the three claims. Distinguish released, in testing, and planned instead of filling gaps from the summary.
Write the brief in your own document
Use a template: “Claim: a tool added a feature. Verified: what its announcement states. Uncertain: account availability. Next step: inspect documentation. Sources: article and primary-material links. Checked: today’s date.” This is a manual example, not a claim of product export support. Every fact should point to supporting material and every inference should be marked. Preserve a conflict between headline and body rather than repairing it yourself.
Boundaries and official entry point
An hourly publishing rhythm does not guarantee that every story remains current; check corrections and follow-ups for consequential claims. Summaries help selection but do not replace full articles and primary material. AI commentary broadens questions. Event packages are not yet available to readers, so this process checks individual stories without them. See the official Readee site for current public content.